HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Re: URL in .CSS files
Author: David
Date: 02/24/2009 18:46
 
WinHTTrack Website Copier 3.43-3

Looks like changing CSS to "text/plain" has no effect.  The relative link is
still changed.

common_styles.css contains this:

li.selected{
	background-image: url(./images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif);
	background-repeat: no-repeat;
	background-position: top left;	
}

hts-log.txt:
Debug: 	link detected in javascript: ./images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gi

Debug: 	link detected in html (tag): ./images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

Debug: 	position link check images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

09:45:30	Debug: 	build relative link images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif with
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/common_styles.css

Debug: 	built relative link images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif with
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/common_styles.css ->
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

Debug: 	wizard link test at
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif..

Debug: 	wizard test begins:
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

Debug: 	file from too far level ignored at testhome.web.test.com :
/wps/themes/html/common/images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

Debug: 	result for wizard link test: 1

Debug: 	External:
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/images/leftnav_arrow_blue03.gif

Info: 	engine: postprocess-html:
testhome.web.test.com/wps/themes/html/common/common_styles.css


Why does it say "link detected in javascript"?What does "file from too far
level ignored" mean?
 
Reply Create subthread


All articles

Subject Author Date
URL in .CSS files

02/23/2009 21:45
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/23/2009 21:47
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/23/2009 22:07
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/23/2009 23:13
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/23/2009 23:30
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/24/2009 15:19
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/24/2009 18:24
Re: URL in .CSS files

02/24/2009 18:46




8

Created with FORUM 2.0.11