HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v
Author: Xavier Roche
Date: 03/25/2004 21:46
 
> 4243984 bytes received 
> at 2793 bytes/sec
>
> 1226058 bytes received at 2217 
> bytes/sec

> A.(excuse me my bad english)At the same conditions the 
> difference in  download velocity is drammaticaly 
> stratosferic.Why?
The amount of data is 4 times more important in the first 
run. Did you update the existing mirror ? Or maybe the 3.31 
release captured more data ?
 
Reply Create subthread


All articles

Subject Author Date
3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/25/2004 01:22
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/25/2004 21:46
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/28/2004 04:20
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/28/2004 04:43
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/26/2004 15:14
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/28/2004 04:13




2

Created with FORUM 2.0.11