HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?
Author: Steffo Carlsson
Date: 04/14/2005 10:35
 
There seems to be something wrong with the forum? I am not
able to respond to a previous message? Anyway, here is my
response to a previous question:


Try cnn.com for example. Filenames get the name:
BANNER_E.HTM, BANNER_E-
2.HTM. Notice the - (minus) character before the number 2. 
I have checked the ISO9660 box so that is not the problem.


*****************************

Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?Author: Xavier Roche
Date: 05/03/2005 17:53
 	
Can't reproduce the issue with a regular 3.33 release 
and "ISO 9660" checkbox checked ; "-" are correctly changed 
into "_" AFAIKS

Can you provide more details please (URL, options used) ? 


*****************************

Subject: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?Author: Steffo
Date: 28/02/2005 11:00
 	

Greetings,
What happened to the ISO9660 compliance in 3.33? I still 
can't get it to work. There are still - (minus) characters 
in the file names (not permitted in ISO9660). See my 
previous postings regarding this matter:
<http://forum.httrack.com/readmsg/9318/index.html>
<http://forum.httrack.com/readmsg/8411/index.html>

I also suggest a change in names under "set options" -
> "Build". Can't "DOS Names (8+3)" be renamed to "ISO9660 
Level 1" and "ISO9660 Names" be renamed to "ISO9660 Level 
2"?
More about ISO9660: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9660>

//Steffo

 
Reply


All articles

Subject Author Date
Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?

04/14/2005 10:35
Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?

04/23/2005 13:04




e

Created with FORUM 2.0.11