| Maybe you could artificially lag your own connection?
High latency plays havoc on bandwidth usage, so maybe
lagging the connection could help. This would
probably requiring using some FreeBSD QoS/AltQ
packages.
Or finding a way to put a 'sleeper' into HTTrack's
requests. If you're into the commandline versions
source code and know how to compile these things, try
hacking the source to increase the delay. Look near
the max connections/sec code and do something simple
to the logic that would let you be more granular.
Maybe change the multiplication code to be max
connections/hour.
My impression is the detection script looks for
continuous, non-bursty access to the site. Bursty
access (quick load of a single or a few HTML pages +
their lages, long pause, quick load, long pause) is
typical for human reading. Slow continous loads are
robotic.
Maybe you could do something with WinHTTrack's Mirror
| Pause function to periodically pause the transfer
manually, let it rest a bit, then resume later.
Finding a way to automate the pause/resuming might be
something to look into. | |