HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Re: Odd behaviour with invalid dates
Author: Xavier Roche
Date: 10/11/2001 14:35
 
> Notice the last-modified date of 1961? Well, httrack 
> saved this file, and timestamped the saved file to 
> this. When it came time for our ackup systems to run 
> on solaris, it had problems (due to 1961 < epoch). 
The 
> thing is, I've never seen httrack take the HTTP 
header 
> date and use this as the file's timestamp...

Yes, the timestamp is taken and saved in the 
filesystem - the strange thing is the odd behaviour of 
your local fs when setting a date<unix epoch..

 
Reply Create subthread


All articles

Subject Author Date
Odd behaviour with invalid dates

10/11/2001 08:31
Re: Odd behaviour with invalid dates

10/11/2001 14:35




7

Created with FORUM 2.0.11