| Subject: Re: Odd behaviour with invalid dates |
Author: Xavier Roche |
Date: 10/11/2001 14:35 |
| | > Notice the last-modified date of 1961? Well, httrack
> saved this file, and timestamped the saved file to
> this. When it came time for our ackup systems to run
> on solaris, it had problems (due to 1961 < epoch).
The
> thing is, I've never seen httrack take the HTTP
header
> date and use this as the file's timestamp...
Yes, the timestamp is taken and saved in the
filesystem - the strange thing is the odd behaviour of
your local fs when setting a date<unix epoch..
| |
|
|
|
|
7
Created with FORUM 2.0.11