HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?
Author: Xavier Roche
Date: 04/23/2005 13:04
 
> There seems to be something wrong with the forum? I am not
> able to respond to a previous message? Anyway, here is my
> response to a previous question:

The database is so slow that I had to limit the time 
between the first post and the last reply

> Try cnn.com for example. Filenames get the name:
> BANNER_E.HTM, BANNER_E-
> 2.HTM. Notice the - (minus) character before the number 
2. 
> I have checked the ISO9660 box so that is not the problem.

Problem spotted (and fixed), due to the collision system

diff -u -d -b htsname.c.orig htsname.c
--- htsname.c.orig      Sat Apr 23 13:04:41 2005
+++ htsname.c   Sat Apr 23 13:03:40 2005
@@ -1343,7 +1343,10 @@
               }

               // ajouter -xx (ex: index.html -> index-
2.html)
+              if (opt->savename_83 != 2)
               sprintf(tempo+strlen(tempo),"-%d",n);
+              else
+                sprintf(tempo+strlen(tempo),"_%d",n);

               // ajouter extension
               if (*a=='.')





 
Reply Create subthread


All articles

Subject Author Date
Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?

04/14/2005 10:35
Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?

04/23/2005 13:04
Subject: Re: What happended to ISO9660 in 3.33?

04/23/2005 13:28




b

Created with FORUM 2.0.11