Thanks for the replies up to now. Yes, I have also tried 3.33 (is there really
another big difference to 3.32?). I'm running Winhttrack on a quad-cpu with
(at least) 4GB of RAM.


I think I didn't quite understand why it is necessary to store such large
amounts of temporary data. Wouldn't it be sufficient to keep a kind of "stack"
for unvisitied and visited URLs? Is it possible to configure Winhttrack so
that it behaves that way?