HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Re: Depth-First
Author: Markus
Date: 04/03/2008 12:27
Thanks for the replies up to now. Yes, I have also tried 3.33 (is there really
another big difference to 3.32?). I'm running Winhttrack on a quad-cpu with
(at least) 4GB of RAM.

I think I didn't quite understand why it is necessary to store such large
amounts of temporary data. Wouldn't it be sufficient to keep a kind of "stack"
for unvisitied and visited URLs? Is it possible to configure Winhttrack so
that it behaves that way?
Reply Create subthread

All articles

Subject Author Date

03/30/2008 17:33
Re: Depth-First

03/31/2008 23:33
Re: Depth-First

03/31/2008 23:37
Re: Depth-First

04/03/2008 12:27


Created with FORUM 2.0.11