> I'll have to find a workaround -- maybe setting 


> the 'working directory' to the caller one ; hoping that 
the 


> filenames will correctly match if the case above is 


> encountered.




This would actually be one of the most useful new features 
ever ;)  Especially if it was an option to allow to use this 
"smart working directory" or use the current "old" method. 
(sorry again about the spacing on my posts!)