HTTrack Website Copier
Free software offline browser - FORUM
Subject: Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v
Author: barry seen
Date: 03/28/2004 04:20
 
> > 4243984 bytes received 
> > at 2793 bytes/sec
> >
> > 1226058 bytes received at 2217 
> > bytes/sec
> 
> > A.(excuse me my bad english)At the same conditions the 
> > difference in  download velocity is drammaticaly 
> > stratosferic.Why?> 
> The amount of data is 4 times more important in the 
first 
> run. Did you update the existing mirror ? Or maybe the 
3.31 
> release captured more data ?> 

Oops!! You'll right.But the download time is too long(Note 
that my connection is analog and the time is precius)or is 
ok?
Many thanks Xavier  
 
Reply Create subthread


All articles

Subject Author Date
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/25/2004 21:46
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/28/2004 04:20
Re: 3.31v (to slow) Vs 3.30v

03/28/2004 04:43




4

Created with FORUM 2.0.11