| > Maybe the sticky mail used by some other forums could
> improve the security here.
I strongly doubt that spammers will take the time to
rebuild the original addresses using the "at", "dot"
things. Mainly because this would generate a lots of
garbage, require some work, and would be useless as
millions of unprotected email addresses are already
available (so why would they care?)
More probably scenario:
- viruses: if you sent mails to people infected (even
temporarily), the virus collected your address in the
existing Outlook messages (and in the "My Documents" files,
Explorer cache, and everywhere else..) and spread itself
using this address. From that point, it could have been
spread to email harvesters.
Virus "authors" are now more and more linked to
mafia/spammers groups to use trojanned machines for various
purpose (DOS/crack attacks against competitors, spamming
gateways, harvesting gateways, round-robin webservers used
to sell illegal products or materials). They also probably
have plenty of public email addresses spread among infected
addresses to "collect" escaped addresses.
- dictionnary attacks on the server using common localized
name/surnames
Anyway I'll try to find a better way to improve mangling of
addresses (possibly by removing the "at"/"dot" form). But I
still think that there is no risk with this technic -
spammers already have more reliable ways (viruses is
probably the best one)
| |