> > Also don't understand your "kiloByte-Connections 
> > per sec". You could say 250 kBC/s = 1kB/s and 250
> > connections which would effectively nuke a server.
> > Speed is nice of course but more connections 
> > can/will slow a server down when it has to allocate
> > resources or do processing.
> 
> I disagree with you here. I believe the whole point
> of experimentation is, to borrow your words, to
> "effectively nuke a server".
> 
> This is from my previous message: "What's the point
> of an off-line browser beta if it cannot dare to
> experiment with speeds of, say, 10 000 kiloByte-Connections
> per second? The two key words are beta and experiment."

Ah sorry, bk.  I think I read your original comment in the wrong context.

Good to hear you're proactive.  Although in my work we do not directly manage
our servers, we have used HTTrack in the past to perform basic stress testing,
so having access to all the program options is still important of course.

Regarding those hidden features in the GUI - it was something I picked up on
the forum long ago from one of Xavier's comments I belive, heh.  I'm really
looking forward to went the wiki is finished and made public! :p

As far as I know any command-line argument (things like -N -I -b0) can be
added to the filters input box.  I've not used it very much myself however. 
Also have not yet tested 3.40-Alphas much.